[Request for Comments] FOSS United Public Policy Roadmap for FY 24-25

For the nth time, how can you say this should be the priority policy without providing any mechanism to see if the entire community thinks this way? Maybe it priority for you, but is it for the entire community?

This is the only unscientific poll I have seen yet. And according to this, whatever the community that responded says we should be focussing on ensuring school syllabus is based on FOSS - which I think is a great point to reflect on. Btw, this was Jan '23 - we have not conducted any such survey yet. Since we have limited resources, should we not focus on this as our prime policy objective? Have we done anything in that direction?

Just on the principle of centralisation of power this is bad. Checks and balances don’t matter when you are dealing with the central governments. Our systems must be designed to be de-centralised. The key ideological thinking behind free software is about “freedom”. Dictatorships are most efficient. Efficiency cannot be the only variable that matters.

Yes these topics require vigourous debates before we come to any common stand. My question was why are we even avoiding them and jumping to “safe” issues?

Also this is not about nuance, it is about incentives. Follow the money.

Climate change? That’s a strawman (and you are usually the first to pick those :smile: ). Aadhaar is a software platform that violates all the principles of free software and we are forced to use it - is this even up for debate?

What is in our purview or not, should be decided through a community mechanism. I may feel how is intellectual property rights in the purview of FOSSUnited? This is a genuine question. Based on the poll, more people think this should be important than ESP.

There are huge financial incentives for the parties involved.

The poll, we’ve been putting in effort into all of those areas with the capacity we have, right? Conversations about FOSS curriculum and adoption in Karnataka, Telengana, Tamil Nadu etc. “Mandating open standards for digital public goods (DPGs)” also. Remember the letter to NPCI that you mentioned earlier?

These are all things, including FOSS/software patents, that we’re slowly working on. What is the point here?

Um, no. That is not a strawman. I just used climate change as an exaggerated “bigger issue” to illustrate a point because you said “there are bigger problems than software patents”. Yes, there are always bigger problems. You cited liberty in society. Sure, but that’s not FOSS Unite’d purview, just like climate change isn’t.

Huh, this makes no sense. Every state and central govt. system, from election card registration, income tax, MCA portals, vehicles, health, insurance, exam results, absolutely every system, 1000s of them, is proprietary SaaS operated by various govts. This is one of the reasons why as a part of our policy efforts, we’ve attempted to advocate for FOSS and open standards wherever we can. We’re talking about absolutely every single govt. system. What do you want us to do about it? What exactly is the solution for govt. SaaS? I don’t know and I hope one day there is one.

Also, this argument is the actual strawman here.

Okay? Every sponsor of FOSS United/our events have varying levels of financial incentives. These are all for-profit corps. I don’t get the point.

3 Likes

Because it is against the four freedoms of FOSS and the entire global FOSS community is against it.

I think we are finally getting somewhere. All these are pro-FOSS suggestions and yes, we can work on them. I wish you had brought this up right at the beginning. Also, this is a Request for Comments and I hope more folks chime and and say what they would like to see us do. Will try to create capacity (voluntary/paid) for additional initiatives.

When I signed up for the policy role, I had very clearly told you and Kailash that this is what I would like to pursue. I am happy to take on more pro-FOSS initiatives but not at the cost of deprioritising the software patents initiative. We are slowly getting traction there and it would be utterly foolish to flush it down the toilet after so much of hard work.

Agreed. In one of our conversations, I had mentioned to you that I am against monopolies in the private sector as well as the government sector. I agree that we must have more decentralized systems too. However, I disagree when you say, “Checks and balances don’t matter when you are dealing with the central governments.” On the contrary, this is exactly where we need more checks and balances. By its very nature, central governments have access to a vast array of IT system and data. Without the kind of governance I argued for in my Indian Express op-ed quoted above, it is hard to have trust in government systems. The problem is not with government systems but with the governance of these systems. For example, some political parties have been known to use electoral records and beneficiary records in their political campaigns. The solution is not in scrapping electoral records or stopping benefits but in preventing and punishing misuse, and building in privacy safeguards.

My humble request is that we keep this a FOSS focused discussion. For non-FOSS issues, there are plenty of forums and we can have vigorous debates there.

1 Like

The point is a tiny set of people (with varying incentives) setting agenda without a clear mechanism for a broad community based group like FOSS United feels inauthentic. If that is not clear, maybe I am just terrible at communication :smile:

My strong opinion would be to use FOSSUnited as a platform to discuss policy and taking stands with some democratic model, but to avoid direct use of funds in specific policy initiatives.

IF we have more funds we should used them to fund indie FOSS projects like AdonisJS, Skytable, RethinkDNS rather than put them in policy.

1 Like

This is how most organizations evolve. Almost all organizations start with a small set of people. Over time, if they don’t broad base themselves, they don’t scale. We are still in the very early stage of our evolution but sharing our thought processes on the forum (something that you have been a strong advocate for), and seeking community input are the right things to do.

Let us look at the counterfactual. If we outline something and get no feedback, should we just twiddle our thumbs and do nothing? In my book, that would be an abject lack of leadership that goes against the goal of building FOSS United as an institution.

Why do you see this as an either/or kind of proposition? Can’t we do both?

You know what happened at iSpirt - there was credibility built through community effort of product founders and a tiny group of policy minded people took advantage of it. I was there and there was clearly no coherence or buy-in of the community. If you have no engagement, then you should consider it as a NO vote, not yes.

Strawman. Can you quote one non-FOSS discussion here?

Either ways. I am jaded as well. I have expressed my strong objections to the way the policy effort is funded and how the agenda is set several times. Anyways we have not resolved any governance mechanism here.

1 Like

Why do you see this as an either/or kind of proposition? Can’t we do both?

This is an issue I’ve been meaning to talk about since quiet some time. I do not wish to further derail this conversation but find it really upsetting that we as FOSS United have paused project grants.

Firstly, I strongly believe policy initiatives at FOSS United should continue. We have got some great members in this community thanks to the GCPP program. We’ve also been one of the only organizations in India to make a small chunk of the population to care about public policy. I’m still not sure if we require another umbrella to actively carry out the work, but the awareness and outreach should definitely be done under FOSS United.

This debate has gone way off track for me to be able to comprehend anything or contribute more. But since the topic of project funding has come up ill give my two paisa in a seperate thread.

4 Likes

Where is this word coming back from?

We discussed this long and agreed that new terms that lead to confusions should not be introduced.

I strongly agree with @rushabh’s comments that there is (at least in perception) a push for surveillance capitalism through FOSS United. Please don’t see my (others’) silence as lack of interest in the topic. It is just lack of interest in FOSS United’s cunning efforts here.

In our About page we have said,

In the Indian context, our goals are:

  • To promote the spirit of hacking and tinkering.*
  • To build quality FOSS for public good.*
  • To enable and evangelise the use of FOSS in academia, social sector, industry and government.*

This is the lens through which proposals should be evaluated. On surveillance tech, I have given my answer in the above thread. Happy to drop the word, “Open Tech.”

I remember a long discussion on the Telegram group on this. This term is vague and is used in open-washing and should be avoided in the context of FOSS. It’s as vague as “powered by AI”. It should just be removed from the FOSS vocabulary for good @Venkatesh_Hariharan @rahulporuri. These terms invite suspicion and scepticism naturally.

With this, I’ll stop any further comments on policy stuff here.


Aside:
I stopped participating in this thread because it just went off the rails. My original post/proposal on this thread was to stop the policy experiments at FOSS United as there’s no community participation. Without active community participation, it becomes a silo (as it has) and is susceptible to varying interpretations (as it has). What is working really well at FOSS United is community building and activities.

Stopping policy stuff at the org is what @rushabh also wants but then the thread just took a really weird tangent instead of something along the lines of “+1, let’s stop it”. This has left me really really confused. I’m personally worn out by every discussion turning into tirades (not just this thread, but several other matters, everything from IndiaFOSS to the conference platform the team has been working on to internships).

About Zerodha, don’t know what to do about the theory that Zerodha is furthering some nefarious agendas by funding the org, apart from stopping funding (which will kill the org because despite our best efforts, we have been unable to build sustainability via broader industry participation). This whole thing is really tiring especially because all funding is explicitly approved by the directors and the team (CC @wisharya). Anyone who suspects that there is some 4D chess going on :smiley:, I’d urge them to speak to the fulltime employees, interns, and volunteers who’ve been running the org! Despite multiple attempts, we haven’t had volunteers step forward and be a part of governance apart from very few (@rahulporuri - @vishnus @realvinay volunteer and commit a lot of time in helping with governance and everything else, but they’re “compromised” because they’re at Zerodha, I guess?).

I’ve had several chats with a very confused and stressed out @wisharya and @mriya11 over the last couple of days. They, and the rest of the fulltime and intern team have been unfortunately at the receiving end of facing mounting confusion and stress from these back-and-forth tirades on N number of matters for more than a year. As directors, “leaders”, we’ve failed to ensure a stress-free work environment for them. Mental health of the people I work with is something I care very much about. I’ve in fact apologised to the team multiple times over the last year for not being able to get a handle on this.

The direction this thread has taken is the final straw for me, personally. Not the specific policy/patent/Aadhaar/DPI/DPG/Zerodha/whatever stuff, but the language and direction which @rushabh used which was not necessary. Not every discussion has to be provocative and devolve into never ending debates. Certain behaviour and language around IndiaFOSS that severely affected the mental wellbeing of the team was a big red flag for me, and it has finally culminated in this thread. Perhaps @wisharya and @mriya11 and the intern would like to share their experiences around some of the matters I am referring to, if they’re comfortable sharing.

I’ll end by reiterating that my original post on this thread was to stop policy stuff at the org as it has not gained community participation! This is in accordance with the agreement we had in a general meeting last year (some ~10 of us, two directors, full time employees, volunteers. The minutes should be somewhere on the forum @rahulporuri @mriya11?) where we had agreed that we would give it 12 more months to see if the policy experiments find community participation and then take a call. Personally, my belief that tech/policy is a critical matter has only grown stronger in the last three years with the government pumping out tech policies at a crazy rate. For FOSS and indie devs and small orgs, software patents specifically is something I personally worry about.

Anyway, that’s it. I’m personally done with this stuff. @rushabh you are free to run it like a democratic/republic without the deep tentacles of any capitalistic cabals! After all, the org originally was your idea.

This thread was just the straw that broke the camel’s back and it’s been building up for a while now. I’ve way too many productive projects that I’m interested in and getting sucked into tirades is something I’ve no need to do. I have candidly communicated with @rushabh that I’m unable to deal with a certain brand of constant, provocative, derisive (it is in my book) communication and language for matter after matter. The constant need to turn every matter into a raging debate, the volatility. There’s a reason why I don’t use social media! @rushabh candidly admits that it is his style of communication. Absolutely fair to have whatever style of communication, but it’s not something I am equipped to deal with or can appreciate. This kind of style is not good for my mental wellbeing personally, and it definitely isn’t good for the young team who have brought this up N times over the last couple of years. I hope they find it comfortable to come forward, speak, and share their thoughts.

The team have my full support to continue the amazing work they’ve been doing. The vibrant, distributed FOSS communities have my full appreciation. I’ll of course always happily support and participate in FOSS activities, projects, initiatives, and I’ll continue to encourage techies to pay attention to and participate in matters of tech/policy (not participating is a systemic societal risk). Also quite amusing that this org also has spiralled into high drama like so many other orgs :smiley:.

Whew! :exploding_head: :sweat_smile: :pray: I hope FOSS United sans Zerodha will not be the cunning, insidious org you think it is!

15 Likes

While we are here. Can we also use this platform to call out the dangerous trend of open washing ?

I am not suggesting to alienate them, But to constructively work with them to ensure that well established community terminologies are not misused.

My suggestion is to keep FOSS United to just be about “FOSS”.

Building stuff. Hacking. Tinkering.
Meetups. Demo’s. Building cool shit.
Network with like minded people. Share code.

Not saying “policy” stuff is not important. But it’s best to keep it separate from FOSS United.

We need more hackers and tinkerers in India.
We need students to know that you can code an IPv4 Packet by hand.
We need young minds to have a home(a.k.a community) to share their love of coding and build stuff.
We need platform where people can show off cool shit that they build.

FOSS United is that. At least it has been for me.

@asd
Its quite sad to see you label the efforts as “cunning”. Whats cunning here?
You just insulted so many volunteers who work at FOSS United.

4 Likes

I want to make it absolutely clear.

I’m making an insinuation. An allegation. I’m making a frank and blunt accusation.

And I’m making it against the founders of FOSS United.

I’m saying that they’ve built FOSS United and hired Venkatesh Hariharan with no regard for the harms that surveillance technology built/pushed by orgs like iSpirt (which Venkatesh Hariharan was part of earlier) unleash on the democracy.

I’m saying that FOSS United engages in open-washing of these surveillance technologies.

And there is proof within this thread that Kailash Nadh is not interested in taking structural reforms that protects FOSS United from being used in this manner.

What is cunning is that this is framed as a limitation of the word “FOSS” whereas it is a limitation of the politics of FOSS United.

Hello. I’m new here, and am grateful to have discovered this community.

However, I’m concerned by the level of unfriendliness on this thread.

Maybe you shouldn’t, you are being unkind.

If we don’t trust the direction of the Directors, we are free to leave / fork / start over. It’s FOSS after all.


On topic: I’m interested in policies and would love to help. I echo the concerns around biases (real or projected) introduced by funding. But I think it’s important for this community to be educated and to be a healthy influence. If there are bandwidth constraints in spawning a disconnected org, we could defer this.

It would be nice to have clarity on the direction, so we can move forward.

2 Likes

Its been a hell of a long week for all of us who are passionate about FOSS and communities. My goal for the posts in this thread was to try and bring in some authenticity in the processes we follow, and wanted to remind the team the importance of transparency and community buy-in. I did not realise that my relationship was the team was dysfunctional and these messages were taken in a very different context than I intended.

In my passion, I think I have overstepped quite a few lines. First, my posts here created a lot of stress in the team that tirelessly works to take the community forward. The bigger blunder was really dragging Zerodha into this. Zerodha is the biggest supporter of FOSS this country has ever seen. @knadh is not only a dear friend, but one of those few people who puts his money where his mouth is. In my posts it inadvertently came out that I was accusing Zerodha when I was just pointing out what a lack of process could mean to an outsider. On hindsight it feels like plain stupidity.

I would like offer the team and specially @knadh my unconditional apology.

Moving forward, I think my role at FOSS United is done. While I will cheer from the sidelines, it is time for new leadership at the organisation. Both Kailash and I have been part time directors with very little context since we have our own day jobs to focus on. This has resulted in tons of miscommunication that has left everyone confused. Luckily we have found someone to fill this up. Going forward @rahulporuri would be taking up the role of driving FOSS United.

Finally, would request the community to give your faith in the new team. People are complex and communities are hard. I am extremely proud with what we have achieved in this short time and I am excited to see where we go from here.

We remain “United by FOSS”

@knadh @rahulporuri and me earlier this evening.

17 Likes

Best photo of the year :grin:

2 Likes

I was sure FOSS United was cooked, but we are so back.

Time to resume hot takes on telegram :face_with_hand_over_mouth:

2 Likes