[DRAFT] A note on blockchain

The hype around blockchain and cryptocurrencies in the mainstream is increasing everyday. As a representative of technology enthusiasts we think it is important to debunk this publicly.

We have prepared a note for posting on our blog and distribution. Would like to get comments from the community regarding this:


[DRAFT] A statement on blockchain

In recent times, blockchain (distributed immutable ledger) as a technology have been proposed as silver bullet solutions to a wide range of unrelated societal problems ranging from enabling cheap money transfers, fixing supply chains, enabling fraud free elections to replacing the role of central banks in controlling money supply. In the Indian context, many influential entities including Business, and Political Leaders have publicly given talks, written articles, and posted on social media about the “transformative powers” of blockchain if India were to adopt it everywhere. The Ministry of Electronics and Telecommunication has come out with a draft of a National Strategy on Blockchain in Jan 2021.

In this note we explain why such sweeping views are unhealthy and should be approached with caution.

Blockchain Hype

Blockchain is commonly said to “solve the problem of trust” cryptographically with distributed consensus. It is claimed that you trust with certainty the validity of a particular piece of information if it is backed by a blockchain.

Our contention is that these are highly exaggerated claims. Blockchain inherently does not verify any piece of information. What it does is to use technology to determine whether a particular sequence of transactions (information) has been modified or not, thus making the information tamper resistant. This is done by maintaining multiple copies of that information and a distributed consensus system to accommodate changes. It does not, and cannot, say anything about the piece of information itself.

As far as we know, blockchain and similar distributed ledger technologies may make sense for building transaction and settlement systems in some contexts, but there are no large scale problems that blockchain has been used to solve with significant tangible benefits compared to existing technologies. Commerce, monetary transactions, and the movement of goods in societies are still rooted in “trust based” systems backed by legal entities. Regulated legal entities using blockchain to implement technical solutions is not in the same vein as the purported “trustless” prowess of blockchain.

For instance, the telecom regulator of India, TRAI, recently introduced a spam prevention system built on top of a distributed ledger that telecom companies will be mandated by laws and regulations to use. In this particular case, given the highly regulated nature of the environment and the operational framework where telcos have to follow regulations, whether a blockchain offers significant benefits over any other technology is unknown. The “trustless”, distributed, and immutable nature of blockchain does not seem relevant in this highly regulated, trust-based environment.

Our Views

While blockchain is an interesting technology which may have niche use cases, like countless other technologies, the fervour with which it is being marketed as a solution to wide ranging societal problems, displays the characteristics of a technology fad or hype cycle. Like any other technology, blockchain is not a silver bullet solution.

As a technology organisation, we strongly recommend institutions to objectively evaluate tried and tested technology choices before considering blockchain based solutions given the extremely high amount of unsubstantiated marketing, evangelism, and hype surrounding it.


Please add your comments or suggestions.

6 Likes

Hi, I hope it isn’t too late for this. It’s a much needed effort!

We need create a clear distinction and improve people’s understanding of some of the things below

  • Distributed Ledger
  • Crypto currency/ Digital currency utility
  • Decentralization
  • Crypto Investment, trading and risks
  • Privacy and Security

Right now everything is mushed together with crazy hype and a lot of people are losing money due to targeted misguided efforts. Not saying its all bad, but it mostly is.

We should aim to provide crisp understanding to people among all the noise they are seeing so that people and organizations can make informed decisions.

I think we could do the following:

  • Make a video series in English and regional languages and promote it (on Youtube too, and other social media too as that’s where people are now :/)
  • Have talks/events that demystify this
  • Promote meaningful decentralization efforts like self-hosting, federated software, etc.

Will add more comments

1 Like

This is US centric, but sharing this interesting stat from the economist: https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2022/05/20/why-the-crypto-crash-hit-black-americans-hard

If we use this as a proxy, people from disadvantaged communities are more likely to lose from scams like crypto (because they are probably more in need of funds and hence fall for the promised profits).

Hey,

I hope I am not too late to reply to this post but would love to add my 2 cents on the topic

  • Blockchain provides an immutable ledger to record transactions happening on the chain i.e records once entered cannot be removed or updated. Each record is saved as a transaction and the transaction has the necessary details of the task performed between parties on the chain that need to be verified.
  • The record can only be updated after at least 51% consensus in the case of Bitcoin and â…“ consensus in the case of some networks like Cosmos running proof of stake network. Validators running on each blockchain network both POS and POW are trusted with this task.
  • Large data or external data on the blockchain needs to be saved responsibly due to its tamper-proof nature. The piece of information or data which needs to be recorded is verified prior to the input to the blockchain via the providers called Oracles. These providers follow their own data stream and validation process in order to feed verified information to the blockchain if the data to be recorded was not created on the chain itself and needs other external sources for functioning. This ensures only the verified data is put to the blockchain.
  • Some blockchain itself doesn’t have capabilities to save a large amount of data on-chain but there is application-specific blockchain just for storing data permanently such as Filecoin and IPFS. Interoperability is now making it possible for other blockchains to use services provided by these blockchains.
  • For the statement, “As far as we know, blockchain and similar distributed ledger technologies may make sense for building transaction and settlement systems in some contexts, but there are no large scale problems that blockchain has been used to solve with significant tangible benefits 1 compared to existing technologies.” This is clearly an understatement in regards to Blockchain technology capabilities, Blockchain is still in the infrastructure building phase, and new ways to solve the problems are discovered regularly. There are far more applications to blockchain other than settlement. This statement is like saying the internet was created just to send emails(Though it felt like it was in the early 90s, we all know now what the internet has achieved).
  • Since this post is from the past year, We all know that the legal binding to a blockchain is under process and is given a thought by the regulators all over the world. Many countries have now started using blockchain to solve problems such as record keeping.

Lastly, there are far more applications to blockchain technology than the one mentioned in the post for eg: We at Gitopia are building the next-generation Decentralised Code Collaboration Platform fuelled by a decentralized network and interactive token economy. Gitopia is designed to optimize the software development process through collaboration, transparency, and open source incentivization. We are trying to solve the most underestimated problem of the internet through blockchain i.e helping find the business model of the open-source. Gitopia too has a token called LORE token which would help in incentivizing opensource contributions. There is no sale planned for the LORE token of Gitopia and the supply will be distributed to developers to migrate their repositories to Gitopia and also contribute to other opensource projects. This distribution will help us move ahead of the token hype cycle and concentrate on building the solution for the community along with promoting the creator economy in open source.

Looking forward to hearing your feedback on Gitopia!

I wholeheartedly agree with the draft note.

The blockchain ecosystem has had a decade to showcase any meaningful real-world implementations, and all we have is snake-oil and ponzi schemes. The note mentions the TRAI system, which has not been put under scrutiny. Another similar one is the government’s vaccine certificate system by the Print2Block startup which has proven no additional benefits over a a centralized ecosystem (such as CoWIN).

This is yet again a “private blockchain”, which provides zero benefits over other audit-trail systems (such as using an Immutable Database like ImmuDB/QLDB) or an audit-trail or transparency log (such as Certificate Transparency).

we strongly recommend institutions to objectively evaluate tried and tested technology choices before considering blockchain based solutions

+1000

4 Likes

I agree with the draft note too.

Explicit statements like this from technologists will help advocacy in other fields like health where techno-solutionism is increasingly creeping in.

3 Likes

A similar statement here: https://concerned.tech/ to the US Senate and congressional leadership requesting “in Support of Responsible Fintech Policy”

We strongly disagree with the narrative — peddled by those with a financial stake in the crypto-asset industry — that these technologies represent a positive financial innovation and are in any way suited to solving the financial problems facing ordinary Americans.

we recommend that the Committee look beyond the hype and bluster of the crypto industry and understand not only its inherent flaws and extraordinary defects but also the litany of technological fallacies it is built upon.

3 Likes

Hey,I hope I am not too late to reply to this post.

I would like to add a few pointers which I think must be discussed.

  1. Some of the biggest innovations in Computer science took a long time before they became mature. For example, the origin of Artificial intelligence is said to be around the 1950s, and now after a long time it is in the state where it can be used on large scale and bigger purposes, still it has many inefficiencies.

With Blockchains we ideally saw it for the first time around 1991 and the first real world blockchain came into existence in 2009 BitCoin.
It is indeed true that Bitcoin as a concept is still relatively pretty new and still in the infrastructure and research phase, which is why I believe we have not really witnessed what is truly capable of.

While blockchain is an interesting technology which may have niche use cases, like countless other technologies, the fervour with which it is being marketed as a solution to wide ranging societal problems, displays the characteristics of a technology fad or hype cycle.

I feel the above statement is pretty bold and not entirely true. Rather it should be framed as blockchain has niche use cases at this point of time. With many governments, financial and academic institutions getting into it we will see some of the biggest use-cases evolving out of it.

Like any other technology, blockchain is not a silver bullet solution.

Completely agree with this POV. Blockchain is not the solution for all the problems, even so Blockchain also introduces new problems that are associated with it, but eventually with tech leaders getting into the skin, these will be solved.

If we use this as a proxy, people from disadvantaged communities are more likely to lose from scams like crypto (because they are probably more in need of funds and hence fall for the promised profits).

This Article here beautifully explains how cryptocurrency can help developing countries to participate more in world trade and eventually opens a way to get into a better position.

This is one of the reasons why crypto currency adoption is much higher in Africa and Southern asia.

People from disadvantaged communities might lose money because of less information which is why awareness is important.

  1. Crypto currencies are not a scam, it generates value from someone doing work to validate the transactions. It’s as simple as that. Crypto currencies are not here to change anything, it just provides better alternative solutions about how we transfer value, which might be useful in many financial operations. Though there are some claims which are absurd, others are based on the properties of the underlying tech AKA blockchain.

Hi @Aditya_Mishra,
“web3” is something big that’s purpotedly built on top of blockchains which is widely marketed. On that note:

1 Like