I agree about the Maintainer Summit being a great idea. I think repeating the intro session every so often just worked—that way latecomers could have the same context as people who were there from the beginning!
I also like the three main rules/points of the conference, including the Rule of Two Feet (freedom to walk away if you think a session is working for you) and You Belong Here (taking the fact that you’re invited to mean you’re qualified to belong in this space, and also assuming the same level of eligibility and competence from others—something that helped a lot for people like me who may tend to suffer from impostor syndrome).
The first few minutes after the first intro (or at least the first after I arrived; maybe there was another before?) was a bit awkward as nobody knew what to do, but asking everyone to come up to the whiteboard and arrange sticky notes helped kickstart the event and bring it to life! What I liked about the unconference format was that whenever I met someone else with common interests, rather than keep the discussion between us, I could schedule an event and get a larger gathering with scope for richer conversations.
Unfortunately, I had to leave halfway because I’d also found out at the last minute about the Accessibility Workshop, a must-attend for me because the project I’m working on (Convo) is NLnet funded and will have to undergo a mandatory WCAG audit eventually.
My one feedback about the Accessibility Workshop is that it was too hard to, well, access. @perry and I missed the first hour of the workshop, and while part of that was on us for leaving the Maintainer Summit late, having to hunt for the exact location within the college campus would have added at least an extra half-hour’s worth of delay. I am not sure how much could have been done in terms of signage on such a vast campus, but I think emailing the location (coordinates) along with the ticket would have helped us get there quicker. I say email because there may be people like me who are not on any of the groupchat platforms, but everyone is guaranteed to have access to their ticket!
The workshop itself was good once we stopped being lost. It did “assume” the use of Microsoft VS Code and Google Chrome, neither of which we had, but we managed with Emacs, Firefox, and a couple of live-reload scripts instead. (It was also conveniently close to where I was staying with family for the night!)
The IndiaFOSS conference itself was overwhelming as usual (in a good way, because there were so many interesting things going on and I didn’t know which to choose!). Between giving a talk, helping out at the Prāv booth, and waylaid by interesting conversations, I didn’t end up attending many talks but did manage to meet a lot of interesting people as well as visit most of the other booths. I didn’t notice any map of the booths; not a problem but it would have been a nice addition. I think the booths moved around a bit on the second day though, so perhaps it wouldn’t have been practical.
I noticed that there’s a lot more effort to reduce waste compared to last time, including encouraging people to bring their own bottles (but also keeping a steel sombu or two for those who don’t have a bottle on hand). There was even a prize for one randomly selected person who handed in a clean plate after lunch—I forgot to go see if I won
but it’s a creative way to encourage less food waste!
Having a printout of the Audi 1 and 2 schedules at various places helped a lot, because I could remind myself at a glance of what was going on there. It would have been good to include the devroom session schedules as well: I actually didn’t end up attending any of them and it was in part because I’d end up only looking at the printed scheduled hung up here and there to decide where to go next.
I would also suggest using a table format for the sessions, or at least make sure they’re aligned in terms of time in some way. (both in the online and offline versions of the schedule). While the current designs looked good, I had to scroll (or look) back and forth and manually compare timings to figure out which sessions were coming up next.
Overall I think the conference was very well organised: the organisers, like a well-chosen font, were fading unobtrusively in the background, yet instantly recognisable 